Hear them Roar! Jaguar has not lost its marks.
Fiona van Iersel
MSc Marketing — King's College London
Module: Consumer Behaviour (7QQMO503X)
Date: 16 February 2025


Executive Summary(100)

Jaguar’s #CopyNothing campaign is a bold move to redefine its identity in a world where luxury, sustainability, and innovation drive consumer choices. It leans on emotive storytelling and brand differentiation, pushing Jaguar as exclusive and innovative—not just another luxury car brand.

#CopyNothing went viral. The abstract messaging and lack of product focus could hurt engagement and purchase intent. A CB analysis shows Jaguar nailed attention and interest but struggled to turn that into action.

Can they fix it? bring in tangible product storytelling, amp up digital experiential marketing, and align the message with sustainability and electric mobility trends.

1. Consumer Analysis(1000)

1.1 Understanding the Target Audience

Jaguar's luxury consumer base consists of wealthy, status-conscious, design-focused, and innovation-driven individuals who value exclusivity and emotional brand connection (Solomon et al. 2021) but also an investment in something that will hold value in the future. Being the first to have a new concept holds value. This aligns with findings from Husic and Cicic (2009), who describe luxury consumers as those who seek prestige, self-expression, and social differentiation. However, automobile purchase decisions remain high-involvement, meaning consumers need both emotional and rational justifications before committing to a luxury car purchase (Kotler et al. 2019). Research by Wiedmann, Hennigs, and Siebels (2007) also suggests that luxury consumers balance symbolic, functional, and experiential values when making purchasing decisions.

The campaign’s abstract nature appeals to high-sensation-seeking consumers, who prioritize uniqueness and innovation (McGuire 1974). Studies by Zuckerman (1994) reinforce that sensation-seeking individuals are more likely to engage with emotionally provocative and artistically daring content. However, the campaign neglects rational buyers, who require product clarity, technological details, and performance justification (Petty and Cacioppo 1986). This aligns with consumer psychology research indicating that high-involvement purchases—such as luxury vehicles—require a mix of affective (emotional) and cognitive (rational) appeals to be effective (Zaichkowsky 1985). I wonder if this is because this campaign was to hype up expectations but the car is still not fully produced so perhaps technical  talk is still yet to come. I remember when Volkswagen introduced the ‘Concept 1’—I even have a Concept 1 T-shirt. Initially, many people thought it was too “out there.” However, by releasing ads before the car hit the market, Volkswagen allowed the design to grow on people. This strategy is consistent with the mere exposure effect, a well-documented psychological principle stating that repeated exposure to a stimulus increases its favorability over time (Zajonc, 1968).

This approach aligns with the marketing principle that multiple touchpoints are often required before a consumer acts on a call to action (Edelman, 2010). Research from McKinsey’s Consumer Decision Journey model supports this idea, showing that customers engage in multiple brand interactions before making a purchase (Court et al., 2009). By strategically engaging potential customers through pre-launch advertising, Volkswagen leveraged a key principle of brand familiarity and trust-building (Aaker, 1991), which is essential for influencing consumer attitudes.

When the Beetle finally launched, it had a stronger market reception than if Volkswagen had merely produced the vehicles and left them waiting on dealership lots for people to “come around” to liking them. This preemptive strategy aligns with diffusion of innovation theory, which suggests that early exposure and communication can ease the adoption process for novel products (Rogers, 2003).

1.2 Consumer Decision-Making Models

AIDA Model (Attention-Interest-Desire-Action)

Attention: The campaign’s cinematic visuals and bold typography effectively grab attention, consistent with visual marketing principles (Pieters and Wedel 2004).

Interest: The "Copy Nothing" messaging intrigues the audience by suggesting exclusivity and rebellion against conformity, a strategy previously used in Apple’s 1984 campaign(Isaacson 2011), which I can still vividly remember to this day.

Desire: I'm being the devil's advocate here. Weak. The lack of product emphasis and tangible benefits results in limited emotional attachment and an unclear value proposition, which contradicts Keller's (2003) findings on strong brand positioning.

Action: Minimal. The absence of clear CTA's (Call-to-Actions) makes it difficult for consumers to transition from engagement to purchase intent, reducing conversion efficiency (Kotler and Armstrong 2021). But they will when they are ready to roll off the lot.

McGuire’s Psychological Motivations

Need for Uniqueness & Self-Expression: The campaign’s emphasis on individuality aligns well with luxury consumers seeking status and differentiation (Tian et al. 2001). Similar tactics were successfully employed in campaigns for high-end fashion brands such as Gucci and Balenciaga (Kapferer and Bastien 2012).

Need for Cognition: The campaign falls short of engaging analytical buyers, as it lacks substantial product information. Research shows that luxury EV buyers require technical specifications, sustainability insights, and performance details to justify purchases (Kapferer and Bastien 2012). Tesla, for instance, successfully integrates technological appeal with brand storytelling, appealing to both rational and emotional decision-makers (Mangram 2012). But I think that’s yet to come.

1.3 Brand Perception and Competitive Comparison

Jaguar’s #CopyNothing campaign serves as a testament to effective marketing in my opining, as it has successfully ignited widespread discussion and debate—one of the key indicators of a campaign’s impact. Much like Apple’s 1984 commercial, which was initially considered too avant-garde, it later became a defining moment in advertising history (Isaacson 2011) and what was considered an outlandish image became the norm. This aligns with Diffusion of Innovation Theory (Rogers 1962), where early adopters embrace bold, futuristic concepts, while mainstream consumers take longer to adjust.

Historically, luxury brands that push creative boundaries tend to shape the future of their industries. For instance, Rolls-Royce and Ferrari have built their brand equity by consistently targeting connoisseurs who prioritize exclusivity over mass appeal (Moore and Birtwistle 2005). Consumers who resonate with Jaguar’s artistic and forward-thinking message are often high-net-worth individuals who collect not only luxury vehicles but also contemporary art and avant-garde design (Kapferer 2015). These are the same consumers who once purchased the first-generation Lamborghinis, Ferraris, and Lotus models before they became mainstream status symbols (Pine and Gilmore 1999).

Additionally, the top 1% of Jaguar’s target audience is accustomed to exclusivity and paying a premium for innovation, much like they do with fine art, rare watches, and one-of-a-kind experiences (Kapferer and Bastien 2012). The extremely high price point of these vehicles does not serve as a barrier but rather as a reinforcement of their status as collectible, avant-garde luxury items. For these consumers, price is not just about cost—it’s about value, uniqueness, and cultural capital (Bourdieu 1984). Much like art collections, they expect their investments to be bold, forward-thinking, and unlike anything else on the market.

This campaign challenges the "cookie-cutter" aesthetic of modern luxury vehicles, many of which have become indistinguishable across brands. If we examine the automobile industry, brands like Mercedes-Benz and BMW have increasingly converged in design elements to appeal to a broader market (Dion and Arnould 2011). This shift towards uniformity dilutes exclusivity, which is precisely what Jaguar’s campaign is fighting against. By aligning itself with high-art and anti-conformist messaging, Jaguar is positioning itself as a visionary brand rather than a conformist one.

2. Performance Evaluation(1000)

2.1 Strengths of the #CopyNothing Campaign

1. Distinctive Branding & High-End Aesthetic

Jaguar’s luxury brand persona is reinforced through sophisticated cinematography, a vivid color palette (in Spanish we say “chinga pupila”. Excuse my French), and an avant-garde approach. This aligns with Keller’s Brand Equity Model (2013), where strong visual branding fosters premium perceptions.

Strengths of the #CopyNothing Campaign

Cultural & Psychological Impact: The campaign stimulates thought, conversation, and emotional reactions, much like iconic disruptive marketing moments in luxury branding history.

Selective Targeting: It is not designed to appeal to everyone—instead, it speaks to forward-thinking, creative, high-net-worth individuals who appreciate luxury as an art form and may want to go against the grain or have something that’s highly publicised for being exclusive.

Differentiation from Competitors: In a market where many luxury car brands have abandoned creative risks, Jaguar is taking a bold stand by committing to a distinctive, visionary identity. This thought came to me when trying to find my car in the school parking lot and even though we all had different brands, all of the cars look pretty much the same. Boring!

Brabus has picked up on this trend and has successfully catered to the segment group by marketing itself as “every BRABUS supercar is a tribute to the superlative—…innovation and 100% individualized. Each model is truly one-of-a-kind.” Allowing them to justify costs beyond the mass produced cars.(Brabus,2025)

This supports the idea that marketing success isn’t measured by universal approval but by resonating with the right audience. If a consumer doesn’t connect with the campaign, it likely means they are not Jaguar’s target demographic—and that’s okay. The true success of #CopyNothing lies in its ability to captivate and inspire the segment of consumers who embrace the future, invest in creativity, and are ready to break away from convention (Keller 2013).

2. Positioning Jaguar as a Rule-Breaking Innovator

By emphasizing non-conformity, the campaign differentiates Jaguar from mainstream luxury competitors like Mercedes-Benz and BMW, which have stayed stuck on heritage and performance messaging. Yet, frankly I think Jaguar was initially a nonconformist completely different concept when they began and are just carrying out the same legacy. Same as Classical Music that was once the electronic music when it first came out and was stocking and taboo, yet now is a classic.

3. Strong Emotional Appeal for Affluent, Creative Buyers

Aligning with Postmodern Consumer Behavior Theory (Firat & Venkatesh, 1995), the campaign targets luxury consumers who prioritize identity, lifestyle, and cultural capital over traditional product attributes.

2.2 Weaknesses & Areas for Improvement

1. Weak Conversion Strategy & Lack of Clear Product Integration

Unlike Tesla, which integrates innovative storytelling with direct product promotion, Jaguar’s campaign does not highlight its latest EV models.

Cognitive dissonance may arise among potential buyers who are attracted by the messaging but struggle to understand why Jaguar is different beyond aesthetics (Festinger, 1957).

Struggling with Woke: People claim that Jaguar failed to read the room with society being exhausted with hence going against the woke movement. They claim that despite a few online very vocal minority groups that do not have the buying power to buy a Jaguar car, most of the segment group are having adverse reactions to the Woke movement and are having trouble seeing a product beyond it(Mance, 2025). Similarly, the backlash Bud Light recently had from showing a transgender person as their brand consumer (Holpuch, 2023), hurt them financially. But it’s one thing to sneak a Bud in your den and another to drive a very public statement in front of your peers.

2. Competitive Gap in Digital Engagement

BMW’s digital M Campaign successfully incorporated interactive configurators and augmented reality (AR) experiences, which increased engagement and purchase intent.

Tesla dominates with user-generated content and community-driven advocacy.

Jaguar has to see if leveraged social media influencers even effects their target group or if they are completely opposing groups to those that can afford to buy a Jaguar and are simply Latent and Aspirationally loyal to the brand. Which won’t pay the bills. Connect and get to know your segment group on an honest level not a socially acceptable level, by using virtual experiences, or interactive marketing to engage audiences and gauge their true feelings.

3. Bottom of the glacier fellings about Messaging for EV Buyers

Today’s luxury car buyers are increasingly drawn to sustainability and innovation narratives (Schmidt, 2022). Or are they?

Jaguar Buyer Sentiment Analysis: True Views on Sustainability & Wokeness

To uncover Jaguar buyers’ real preferences—bypassing social desirability bias—use implicit research methods:

1. Implicit Association Test (IAT)

Measures subconscious associations with luxury, tradition, sustainability, or wokeness (Greenwald et al., 1998).

Identifies whether buyers secretly resist woke messaging or doubt EV sustainability.

2. Ad Testing (Eye-Tracking & Facial Coding)

Show heritage vs. progressive ads, tracking engagement & emotional response (Lewinski, 2015).

Reveals whether Woke gender, sustainability & diversity messaging attract or repel buyers.

3. Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

Forces trade-offs: Gas-powered performance vs. EV sustainability and the belief that batteries are not the way and the source of energy for the electric cars is not sustainable. (Orme, 2020)

Shows if buyers truly prioritise green credentials or just say they do.

4. Social Listening & Sentiment Analysis

Analyzes online discussions on Jaguar, EVs & woke culture (Pang & Lee, 2008).

Detects skepticism toward woke advertising & sustainability claims (Financial Times, 2024).

5. Ethnographic Focus Groups

Observes real discussions on status, identity & EVs (Borghini et al., 2009).

Identifies if buyers reject woke movements but avoid stating it publicly. For instance, Jaguar's recent rebranding faced criticism for being overly progressive, alienating traditional consumers. (Bland,2024)

Weaknesses & Areas for Improvement

Education & Gradual Adoption: The campaign may take time for mainstream consumers to accept, as it follows the adoption curve of disruptive ideas.

Lack of Product Focus: While artistic and innovative, the campaign should include product storytelling to help justify its vision with tangible technological and performance-driven innovations.

3. Recommendations: Future Directions for the Campaign (400)

Read the room and know your segment group. Off the back of the IAT results :

If buyers favor tradition → Focus on heritage & performance.

If buyers reject wokeness → Keep branding neutral & status-driven.

If buyers doubt EV sustainability → Sell EVs as high-performance innovation, not eco-friendly alternatives (AP News, 2024).

To improve the effectiveness and consumer engagement of the #CopyNothing campaign, Jaguar should focus on the following strategies:

3.1 Integrate Tangible Product Storytelling

JUST FOCUS ON THE CAR not politics! Feature Jaguar’s latest EV models in campaign visuals, ensuring the audience connects the branding message with the actual product.

Develop mini-documentaries showcasing Jaguar’s tech innovation and craftsmanship.

Use product placement in aspirational lifestyle settings to bridge emotional branding with functional appeal.

3.2 Leverage Digital and Experiential Marketing

Implement AR/VR test drives on social media, similar to BMW and Porsche.

Partner with luxury lifestyle influencers and artists that reach the segment group of people that can actually afford a the Jaguar to create co-branded content, reinforcing Jaguar’s exclusivity and artistry to the correct segment group in a way that matters to them. .

3.3 Align with Sustainability and Innovation Trends if that’s what the target group wants.

Reinforce Jaguar’s commitment to zero-emissions mobility by showcasing its sustainability efforts in manufacturing and technology.

Integrate "sustainability storytelling" into the campaign, making eco-conscious innovation a central theme.

Collaborate with sustainable luxury events (e.g., Formula E, Art Basel) to enhance Jaguar’s green brand perception.

3.4 Optimize Consumer Call-to-Actions (CTAs) and Conversion Tactics

Include strategic CTAs, such as "Book a Virtual Test Drive" or "Experience the Future of Luxury" in ads.

Implement personalized landing pages, directing different audience segments to relevant Jaguar content (e.g., luxury seekers vs. sustainability-conscious buyers).

By adopting these recommendations, Jaguar can bridge the gap between aspirational branding and purchase intent, ensuring the #CopyNothing campaign translates into long-term brand loyalty and increased EV sales.

Bibliography (APL 7 Referencing Format)

Academic Sources

Aaker, D.A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. Free Press.

Bland, A. (2024). Wednesday briefing: What Jaguar’s radical rebrand reveals about the shift to electric cars. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/04/wednesday-briefing-what-jaguars-radical-rebrand-reveals-about-the-shift-to-electric-cars?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].

BRABUS GmbH. (n.d.). Supercars. Retrieved February 9, 2025, from https://www.brabus.com/en-int/cars/supercars.html

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Borghini, S., Diamond, N., Kozinets, R., McGrath, M. A., Muñiz, A. M., & Sherry, J. F. (2009). Why are themed brandstores so powerful? Journal of Retailing, 85(3), 336-350.

Court, D., Elzinga, D., Mulder, S., & Vetvik, O.J. (2009). ‘The Consumer Decision Journey.’ McKinsey Quarterly.

Dion, D. & Arnould, E. (2011). ‘Retail luxury strategy: Assembling charisma through art and magic’, Journal of Retailing, 87(4): 502–520.

Edelman, D.C. (2010). ‘Branding in the Digital Age: You’re Spending Your Money in All the Wrong Places.’ Harvard Business Review.

Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.

Firat, A.F. & Venkatesh, A. (1995). Postmodernity, Consumer Culture, and the Society of the Spectacle. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(3), 227-252.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464.

Holpuch, A. (2023). Behind the Backlash Against Bud Light’s Transgender Influencer. The New York Times. [online] 21 Nov. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/article/bud-light-boycott.html.

Hoffman, J. & Coste-Manière, I. (2012). Luxury Strategy in Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Husic, M. & Cicic, M. (2009). ‘Luxury consumption factors’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 13(2): 231–245.

Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Kapferer, J.N. (2015). The New Strategic Brand Management: Advanced Insights and Strategic Thinking. London: Kogan Page.

Kapferer, J.N. & Bastien, V. (2012). The Luxury Strategy: Break the Rules of Marketing to Build Luxury Brands. London: Kogan Page.

Keller, K.L. (2003). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Keller, K.L. (2013). Strategic Brand Management: Global Edition. Harlow: Pearson.

Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (2021). Principles of Marketing. 18th ed. Harlow: Pearson.

Kotler, P., Keller, K.L., Brady, M., Goodman, M. & Hansen, T. (2019). Marketing Management. 4th European ed. Harlow: Pearson.

Lewinski, P. (2015). Automated facial coding software outperforms people in recognizing facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1386.

Mance, H. (2025). Where ‘woke’ went wrong. [online] @FinancialTimes. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/5ba3c3a8-8ccb-414e-b299-41f5b0e29021 [Accessed 9 Feb. 2025].

Mangram, M.E. (2012). ‘The globalization of Tesla Motors: A strategic marketing plan analysis’, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20(4): 289–312.

McGuire, W.J. (1974). ‘Psychological motivations and marketing behavior’, Journal of Marketing, 38(2): 37–49.

Moore, C.M. & Birtwistle, G. (2005). ‘The nature of parenting advantage in luxury fashion retailing’, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(4): 256–270.

Okonkwo, U. (2007). Luxury Fashion Branding: Trends, Tactics, Techniques. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Orme, B. (2020). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research. Research Publishers LLC.

Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1–135.

Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. New York: Springer.

Pieters, R. & Wedel, M. (2004). ‘Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text-size effects’, Journal of Marketing, 68(2): 36–50.

Pine, J. & Gilmore, J.H. (1999). The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Schmidt, A. (2022). The Luxury EV Market and Consumer Perceptions. Automotive Trends Journal, 18(2), 90-105.

Sit, J. (2024, December 10). Why Jaguar is taking such a big risk with its rebrand and pink concept car. University of Portsmouth. Retrieved from https://www.port.ac.uk/news-events-and-blogs/blogs/popular-culture/why-jaguar-is-taking-such-a-big-risk-with-its-rebrand-and-pink-concept-car

Solomon, M.R., Dahl, D.W., White, K., Zaichkowsky, J.L. & Polegato, R. (2021). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being. 13th ed. Harlow: Pearson.

Tian, K.T., Bearden, W.O. & Hunter, G.L. (2001). ‘Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation’, Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1): 50–66.

Wiedmann, K., Hennigs, N. & Siebels, A. (2007). ‘Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: A cross-cultural framework’, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 7: 1–21.

Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985). ‘Measuring the involvement construct’, Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3): 341–352.

Zajonc, R.B. (1968). ‘Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1-27.

Zuckerman, M. (1994). Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Original AI-use disclosure

Step 1: Name the AI technologies used and summarise how you have used them.

I acknowledge the use of ChatGPT (https://chat.openai.com/) to assist in generating background information for my research, specifically to brainstorm possible research methods, refine my grammar and writing structure, and condense content for word count.

I acknowledge the use of ChatGPT (https://chat.openai.com/) and Grammarly for spelling and grammar check, and to identify improvements in the overall flow and structure of my writing. Asked Chat Gpt to organize my reference list in alphabetical order. “Are there any images I can add from real life situations to support this?”

Step 2: Describe how the information or materials were generated and how you amended them following guidelines on academic integrity.

Prompt used with ChatGPT: "can you suggest resources that will back my argument of the following essay?" “what is the word count?” “Please edit for grammar spelling and punctuation?”

Output generated: ChatGPT suggested various  sources that I have to look up and see if they did or did not relate.

The output was modified as follows: I integrated the suggestions from ChatGPT into my own writing by elaborating on the  research in the context of my specific thesis, ensuring the final content aligned with the guidelines provided in my module. I also cross-referenced with additional sources from academic databases for further validation.

Prompt used with ChatGpt:"what are similar ads that have shown individuality"

Output generated: Chat Gpt  showed ad’s such as Gucci and Selfridges Radical Luxury campaign.

[Archive notes]

This is independent academic coursework by Fiona van Iersel, not an official King’s College London or company publication.

Routine administrative cover, candidate and student identifiers, contents list and repeated cover headings are omitted. AI-use disclosure is retained separately; raw AI-chat output screenshots are not republished as original prose.

Campaign audience and conversion commentary is the author’s academic interpretation, not reported campaign performance research.

The cover’s actual Date Submitted is 16 February 2025; the stated deadline of 17 February is not substituted for it.

The AI-chat screenshots and later visual-research suggestion notes after the AI appendix are excluded because their status as original authored prose is unclear. The complete main essay, bibliography and AI-use declaration are retained.