Re: P&G Tide Case Study
Fiona van Iersel
MSc Marketing — King's College London
Module: E-Services Marketing (7QQMO519X)
Date: 19 May 2025
https://keats.kcl.ac.uk/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=756333

Re: P&G Tide Case Study
Submitted: 19 May 2025 11:02 PM

Hi Claire, I really enjoyed reading your take on the Tide Dry Cleaners case. You packed in a lot of insight, especially in the way you connected P&G’s service expansion to their broader innovation strategies like Connect & Develop and FutureWorks. That was a great touch — it shows you’re thinking beyond just the brand extension and considering the company’s wider vision.

I also liked the way you broke down the market opportunity so clearly — identifying the service-heavy nature of the U.S. economy and the fragmented dry cleaning landscape really helped set the context. It made P&G’s move into this space feel not just smart, but inevitable.

Your comparison table in Question 3 was super effective — concise but packed with useful detail. It was great to see how you linked every key attribute (tech, convenience, service, store environment, etc.) to both the traditional and the Tide model. That structure worked really well to highlight how Tide transforms an everyday service into something genuinely premium and brand-aligned.

One idea you could build on further is the emotional value of the customer promise. You mentioned “helping customers reach their dreams,” which is a lovely way to put it — it might be interesting to link that to emotional branding theory (Gobé, 2010), since Tide isn’t just delivering clean clothes, it’s aiming to inspire confidence and trust.

Also, your marketing mix section is well thought through — especially your point about stores acting as part of the brand experience. If you wanted to go even deeper, you could mention ‘process’ or ‘people’ to round out the 7Ps (Bitner & Booms, 1981) — things like the role of staff in keeping the “guest” experience consistent, or how the tech-enabled processes reinforce the promise of reliability.

Overall, your analysis was thoughtful, sharp, and easy to follow — great work!

Best, Fiona



References