From the academic archive. Fiona’s original academic writing. Views are personal and do not represent King’s College London. Historical examples, proposals and opinions retain their original context. Formatting has been repaired; original wording and references are preserved. Any editorial clarification is labelled separately.
Original submission details

Original title: 🏛️🎓📈🧠🤝🌍✨ The strongest university brands don’t win when a student enrols. They win when the experience consistently fulfils the expectations that the brand created in the first place.

View original KEATS context ↗ (university access required).

The original question / King’s College London

1.5 Reflecting on the importance of brands

Reflect on the reasons that led you to apply to King’s, and this specific programme. Post a brief explanation to the discussion forum outlining what influenced your decision (300 words maximum).

Course task reproduced as context. The response below is Fiona’s independent academic work. KEATS source ↗ (university access required).

Explore writing on this question ↗
Fiona’s response

When I decided to study for my Master’s, my decision was actually quite practical. I work full-time, so flexibility was essential rather than simply a desirable feature. I also wanted a programme that covered the areas I genuinely wanted to discover the future of marketing, the modern direction of industry branding and predict the future ofconsumer behaviour using the latest development in tools. This would help me be the best at my job cutting edge ! differentiate ! Finally, I wanted a qualification from a university with a strong international reputation so that people saying that diploma would know what it meant.

King’s College Londons marketing ticked all of those boxes.

Reflecting on my decision through the lens of this module, I was responding to the King’s brand.

According to Aaker (1991), strong brands create brand equity, adding value beyond the product or service itself by increasing trust and reducing uncertainty. This resonated with my own decision-making process. Choosing a university is a high-risk purchase because prospective students cannot fully evaluate the experience before committing considerable time, money and effort. Instead, we rely on indicators such as reputation, rankings and credibility.

King’s successfully communicated those signals through its global reputation, academic heritage and flexible online learning model (King’s College London, n.d.). These factors reduced the perceived risk of my decision and gave me confidence that the programme would deliver what it promised.

From a marketing perspective, this also reflects Signalling Theory. Spence (1973) argues that when consumers face uncertainty, they rely on credible signals to assess quality. Reputation, accreditation and institutional prestige become valuable cues that help simplify complex decisions.

However, this module has also made me think about branding from another perspective.

Attracting students is only one part of building a successful brand.

Retaining their confidence is arguably even more important.

Berry (2000) explains that service brands are created not only through advertising but through every interaction customers have with an organisation. In higher education, these interactions include communication, accessibility of staff, quality of teaching, up to date digital learning platforms, timely feedback and the sense of community students and real world preparation.

This aligns closely with Keller’s (2001) Customer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE) Model. While awareness and reputation encourage prospective students to enrol, long-term brand loyalty develops when the actual experience consistently reinforces the expectations created before enrolment.

As both a marketing professional and a student, this leads me to one suggestion for King’s.

Continue investing just as heavily in the student experience as in attracting new students.

Many online students are balancing demanding careers, families and other commitments. Flexibility should therefore extend beyond simply offering online lectures. It should also be reflected all that was promised and fortify a feeling of belonging. This is supported by Expectation-Confirmation Theory, which proposes that customer satisfaction occurs when experiences meet or exceed the expectations established before purchase (Oliver, 1980). Strong branding attracts customers, but consistently delivering on those promises is what creates trust, advocacy and long-term loyalty.

A useful comparison is Apple.

People rarely purchase Apple products solely because of processor speeds or technical specifications. Instead, they invest in confidence built through years of consistently positive customer experiences. Universities operate in much the same way. Students are investing not only in knowledge but also in confidence that the institution will support their academic and professional development throughout their journey.

Before studying this module, I would simply have said that I chose King’s because it had an excellent reputation, offered the flexibility I needed and covered exactly the subjects I wanted to learn.

Now I see something more.

The King’s brand successfully reduced the uncertainty surrounding one of the biggest educational decisions I have made. The next challenge, and perhaps the greatest opportunity, is ensuring that every stage of the student journey consistently delivers on that original promise. In today’s increasingly competitive higher education sector, attracting students is only half the branding challenge.

The real measure of a successful brand is whether students still believe they made the right choice long after they have enrolled.

References.

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. Free Press.
  2. Berry, L. L. (2000). Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281012
  3. Keller, K. L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity. Marketing Management, 10(2), 14-19.
  4. King’s College London. (n.d.). Why King’s. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/study/why-kings
  5. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
  6. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
  7. Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2021). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
← Back to the journal